
High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) is a realignment procedure that demands precise pre-operative planning to ensure successful mechanical axis correction and optimal patient outcomes.
A minor error in angle calculation or hinge placement can result in under-correction, over-correction, or compromised fixation. Hence, understanding biomechanical axes, radiologic landmarks, and mathematical planning tools is crucial.
This article breaks down the 5 key steps of osteotomy planning, supported by classic radiographic tools and validated trigonometric charts.
π Step 1: Define the Malalignment
The first goal is to evaluate the mechanical axis deviation β most commonly varus in medial compartment osteoarthritis.
- The Mechanical Axis (Mikulicz Line) extends from the center of the femoral head to the center of the ankle joint.
- In a normally aligned limb, this line passes through the center of the knee (i.e., 50% of the tibial width from medial to lateral).

π Interpretation:
- If the axis falls medially (e.g., at 20β30%), it indicates a varus deformity.
- This line is drawn using long-leg standing radiographs, with values expressed in percentage of tibial plateau width (0% = medial edge, 100% = lateral edge).

π Step 2: Locate the Deformity
Determine whether the deformity lies in the:
- Femur (Distal Femur)
- Tibia (Proximal Tibia) β most common in HTO candidates
- Or both (combined deformities)
You assess this by measuring:
- mLDFA (mechanical lateral distal femoral angle): Normal β 87Β° Β± 3Β°
- mMPTA (mechanical medial proximal tibial angle): Normal β 87Β° Β± 3Β°
If mMPTA is decreased (e.g., < 84Β°), the deformity is tibial and HTO is indicated.

π Step 3: Define the Target Axis
Objective:
Determine the desired weight-bearing line (WBL) post-correction.
Fujisawa Point (62.5%):
- The ideal WBL should pass through 62.5% of the tibial plateau width (lateral to the midline).
- This ensures load redistribution from the damaged medial compartment to the healthier lateral side.
How to Mark It:
- Divide the tibial plateau into 10 equal parts (0% = medial edge, 100% = lateral edge).
- The target WBL should cross at 62.5% (slightly lateral to the centre).

β Step 4: Choose Osteotomy Type and Hinge Point
Objective:
Choose between opening vs. closing wedge and define the hinge location.
A. Osteotomy Type Selection
| Opening Wedge HTO | Closing Wedge HTO |
|---|---|
| More common | Less common |
| Easier to adjust | More bone removal |
| Requires bone graft | No graft needed |
| Lower risk of peroneal nerve injury | Higher nerve injury risk |
B. Hinge Point Location
- Opening Wedge: The lateral hinge is 1 cm below the joint line (must remain intact for stability).
- Closing Wedge: The lateral hinge is at the cortex, and a wedge is removed medially.
β Step 5: Measure the Correction Angle (Miniaci Method)
Objective:
Calculate the wedge size needed to achieve the desired correction.
Miniaci Method Steps:
- Draw Pre-Op MA Line: From femoral head β ankle center (passes medial to knee).
- Draw Post-Op Target MA Line: From femoral head β Fujisawa point (62.5%).
- Find Intersection Point (CORA):
- The apex of deformity is where the pre-op and post-op MA lines intersect (Center of Rotation of Angulation, CORA).
- Measure Correction Angle:
- The angle between the two MA lines at the CORA = required correction angle (ΞΈ).
- Calculate Wedge Size:
- Opening Wedge: Use trigonometry (wedge height β tan(ΞΈ) Γ osteotomy width).

π In a Nutshell
High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) is not just a bridge to knee replacement β itβs a proactive approach to preserve the joint, optimize biomechanics, and extend active life in younger, high-demand patients. With accurate pre-operative planning and precise execution, HTO transforms the way we manage unicompartmental knee arthritis. A well-aligned joint today can mean a well-preserved knee tomorrow.
References:
HTO Planning: How to do it
: https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/high-tibial-osteotomy-when-and-how/234823470
Art of Realignment Surgery
: https://orthopaedicprinciples.com/2019/05/art-of-realignment-surgery/
